What does "strict liability" in tort law imply according to Utah law?

What does "strict liability" in tort law imply according to Utah law?

• A. Liability based on actual negligence
• B. Liability that depends on intent to harm
• C. Liability that does not depend on actual negligence or intent to harm
• D. Liability that is exempt under certain conditions

Answer: (C)

Strict liability in tort law implies that a party can be held legally responsible for an act or omission regardless of fault, negligence, or intent to harm. Under Utah law, strict liability typically applies in cases involving inherently dangerous activities or defective products. This means that as long as the plaintiff can prove that the defendant was involved in the activity or manufactured the product that caused harm, the defendant can be held liable without needing to demonstrate that the defendant acted with negligence or intended to cause harm. This legal framework is designed to encourage safety and hold parties accountable for risks they create, regardless of their intention or care in preventing harm. Thus, the concept of strict liability centers on the nature of the activity or product rather than the conduct of the defendant.

Strict liability in tort law implies that a party can be held legally responsible for an act or omission regardless of fault, negligence, or intent to harm. Under Utah law, strict liability typically applies in cases involving inherently dangerous activities or defective products. This means that as long as the plaintiff can prove that the defendant was involved in the activity or manufactured the product that caused harm, the defendant can be held liable without needing to demonstrate that the defendant acted with negligence or intended to cause harm. This legal framework is designed to encourage safety and hold parties accountable for risks they create, regardless of their intention or care in preventing harm. Thus, the concept of strict liability centers on the nature of the activity or product rather than the conduct of the defendant.